Ermetis

A sample set built on fictional content. Holcombe Mechanical is not a real company and none of this reflects a real engagement.

The samples tell one story.

Holcombe Mechanical is a fictional $16M commercial mechanical contractor, and every sample in the set was built for it. A bid request arrives, and everything that follows runs on the same memory: pricing rules, agreements, purchase orders and reporting definitions, written down and approved. The stops play in order by themselves, and each one opens the full sample at the screen it describes.

  1. Outlook Search ─  ▢  ✕ quotes@holcombemech DM Dana McElroy RFQ: RTU replacements… MS Mansfield Supply Quote Q-8841, revision KP Kathy Pardue FW: after-hours rates… RFQ: RTU replacements, Store 118 DM Dana McElroy <dmcelroy@bexleyfoods> Facilities Manager, Bexley Foods · Tue 12:02 PM Doug, we are ready to move on the two rooftop units at Store 118 that failed inspection in June. We need the work done at night, sales floor stays open. Can you have a bid to us by Friday? Corporate wants a repair-versus-replace comparison this time. PDF Store118_RTU_schedule.pdf 412 KB
    1 · Tuesday 12:02

    The request arrives.

    Dana McElroy at Bexley Foods writes to the quotes inbox: two rooftop units at Store 118 failed inspection, the work has to run at night, and the bid is due Friday. The drafter reads the email and the attached schedule and starts drafting. Nobody has opened the email yet.

    Open this one
  2. Quoting review · BEX-118 SharePoint Bexley Foods · Store 118 · RTU replacement Draft · assembled 12:29 (2) 15-ton packaged rooftop units $47,300 Vendor intake › Q-8841.pdf · Aug 12 Crane, two night picks $4,400 Workbook v2026.3 › crane schedule Grocery rooftop adder, labor +12% $2,010 Rule DW-7 · approved by Doug Wetzel Bid total · margin 24.1% $83,230 Margin memo · floor 22% ⚑ Flag One vendor price is 61 days old. Queued: reconfirm with Mansfield. ⚑ Flag The repair option lands below the margin floor. Needs an estimator.
    2 · Tuesday 12:29

    The draft cites every number.

    Twenty-seven minutes later a draft is waiting on Holcombe’s own SharePoint. Nothing goes to the customer until an estimator approves it. Every line cites the record behind it, including rule DW-7, the grocery rooftop adder Doug approved with its reasoning written down. The draft flags two things for an estimator: a vendor price past its age threshold, and a repair option below the margin floor.

    Open this one
  3. Quoting review · BEX-118 SharePoint Bexley Foods · Store 118 · RTU replacement In review · Doug Wetzel · 1:42 DOUG’S EDIT, ON THE CRANE LINE Two picks changed to three. “Store won’t clear the east lot for staging.” New total $85,430, margin 23.6%, still over the floor. FLAG 1 · RESOLVED Mansfield reconfirmed the price today. FLAG 2 · DECIDED Replace only, with a note to Dana on why. ✓ Approved by Doug Wetzel, 1:58. The proposal went to Dana on Holcombe letterhead.
    3 · Tuesday 1:42

    Doug reviews and approves.

    Doug changes the crane picks from two to three and writes down why. He decides both flags, approves, and the proposal goes to Dana on Holcombe letterhead. The staging constraint he recorded is saved against Store 118, so the next draft for that site starts from three picks.

    Open this one
  4. Outlook Search ─  ▢  ✕ RE: Store 104 walk-in down + invoice question HS Holcombe Mechanical Service to Dana McElroy · Wed 8:41 AM Dana, we have a crew heading to Store 104 this morning; Ray Mabry’s team is scheduled for 10:30. The walk-in is covered under your agreement, including the emergency call. This is the second failure on that cooler since late July, so our service manager has asked estimating for a replacement option. On the July invoice, you are right. A credit memo for $412 was issued this morning and will show on your next statement. Sent by Donna Kesler · the flags went to Renee Suggs and Terry Hobbs first
    4 · Wednesday 8:14

    The service desk answers the customer.

    Dana writes to the service inbox the next morning: the walk-in cooler at Store 104 is down, and a July invoice looks wrong. The desk drafts a reply from the signed agreement and the service history, and the two judgment calls go to the people who own them, Renee on the repeat failure and Terry on the credit. Donna sends the reply at 8:41 with the $412 credit already issued.

    Open this one
  5. Teams Search ─  ▢  ✕ KP Kathy Pardue Riverside Dental, after-hours tonight. Which rate class applies? Rate class 2, at the after-hours multiplier of 1.5. Rate schedule 2026 › after-hours service · trip charges CS Cody Sturgill Owner wants to supply their own units. Do we warranty the equipment? That is not documented. Three documents address warranty, and none covers customer-supplied equipment. Routed to Doug Wetzel The ruling will be recorded.
    5 · Wednesday 2:20

    The answer desk answers one question and routes the other.

    Kathy asks which rate applies to an after-hours call and has the answer in seconds, with the rate schedule rows cited. Cody asks whether Holcombe warranties equipment a customer supplies. Nothing on file settles that, so the desk says so and routes the question to Doug, and it comes back the next morning as recorded rule W-12.

    Open this one
  6. AP review · INV-88312 SharePoint Mansfield Supply · invoice 88312 · job BEX-118 matched 9:14 (2) 15-ton packaged rooftop units $38,900 PO-5521 · same units, same price Delivered to the Store 118 site BuildOps › BEX-118 · receiving note Freight $380 Q-8841 · quoted freight included Invoice total $39,280 PO total $38,900 ✓ Passed Three-way match: the PO, the receiving note, and the invoice agree. ⚑ Flag The freight line is not on the PO. Queued to Terry Hobbs.
    6 · Four weeks later

    The invoice matches its job.

    Bexley accepted the bid, and the equipment order went to Mansfield Supply on PO-5521. Four weeks later the invoice arrives in the AP inbox and matches the order and Ray’s receiving note to the dollar. One line does not match: quote Q-8841 said freight was included, so the $380 freight charge waits for Terry.

    Open this one
  7. Outlook Search ─  ▢  ✕ Holcombe operating brief · week of October 5 OB to Brian Aldridge, Terry Hobbs, Renee Suggs, Doug Wetzel · Mon 7:00 AM The week’s numbers, computed Sunday night. Every number links to its record. Backlog $2.34M · up $180K Unbilled T&M $84,200 Agreements due in 60 days 9 · $312K Margin vs estimate, closed jobs 23.8% vs 24.6% Exceptions 3 · Renee, Doug, Terry The Lawton job is tracking 17.2% against 23.5%. Doug’s note lands on workbook assembly A-231.
    7 · Monday 7:00

    The brief reports the week.

    The brief lands in Brian’s inbox at 7:00 on Monday, computed overnight from BuildOps and the QuickBooks exports. Every number links to the record it was computed from, and each of the three exceptions has an owner assigned. One of them, the margin gap on the Lawton job, becomes Doug’s note on workbook assembly A-231, and the next controls bid will read it.

    Open this one

Every stop was reading from the same place.

The memory holds the pricing rules, the agreements, the purchase orders and the reporting definitions, written down, approved, and cited in every answer. It has a sample of its own, and there is also a sample where a person uses it directly, with no software anywhere in the workflow.

The free assessment does the same thing against your own work.

It starts with a thirty-minute call on one process that is costing you something, and the written assessment comes back within two business days.

Choose a time